Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Reliant Direct
Online or In store you will save more
01253 440274
 
 
Tuesday, 6th January 2009

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Blackpool Gazette site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

One way system to chaos



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 20 November 2008
POULTON residents have branded plans to reverse the town's one-way system "ludicrous".
Members of the public gave their views on the scheme, part of proposals for a new health centre in the town centre, at a meeting of the local area forum.

Garry Payne, director of planning and regeneration, attended the meeting, along with about 100 local residents, to discuss the plans.

Research carried out by the highways department measured air pollution levels as "critical".

Mr Payne claimed reversing the traffic flow would lead to less congestion and reduce pollution – but residents disagreed.

David Baker, of Mosshouse Road, said: "We have put up with a huge amount of traffic for a number of years.

"I'm not against modernisation, but it's bad now and this could make it a lot worse."

Steve Rolland, of Poulton Residents' Association, dubbed the scheme ludicrous, adding: "Does the highways engineer live here? Has he tried to negotiate these roads? It's all very well having statistics."

John Bailie, of Blackpool Old Road, questioned why the change was even needed if the new centre – planned to be built on the site of St Chad's Church Hall and the local tennis club on Vicarage Road – was to have, as had been claimed, "a minimal impact on traffic".

He said: "We can't see that it will make traffic flow in the town centre better – it's going to compromise safety, increase congestion and pollution. Traders are very concerned."

Trevor Allison, 57, of Haworth Crescent, added: "It's going to create chaos. To swap the one-way system around, it's ridiculous."

Bus companies have also expressed concern about how vehicles will turn if the new one-way system is introduced.

Planning officers have vowed to look into their concerns.

Mr Payne said: "The bus company has been consulted and has expressed some concerns over some of the junctions.

"We have asked the developer to come back with more detail on this and to show buses can turn.

"If they cannot, then we cannot recommend this proposal goes forward."

The full article contains 342 words and appears in Blackpool Gazette newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 20 November 2008 6:53 AM
  • Source: Blackpool Gazette
  • Location: Blackpool
 
Prev
1
Next
1

cjack,

Poulton 20/11/2008 09:51:57
At one time there was two way traffic troughout the whole of Poulton, including the now pedestrianised area. I don't recall too many problems for buses then.

But something does have to be done about the traffic flow in Poulton.

Maybe it's time to pedestrianise the whole centre and stop traffic entering Ball Street altogether.
There is total nonsense being expounded on the level of traffic that will be generated by the proposed medical centre. It replaces two existing centres located at opposite ends of the town and so the amount of traffic has to remain the same. It will just pass someone elses house instead and they are getting upset about it.
2

Federa,

20/11/2008 12:46:16
Simplistic as usual....oh that it was all so simple. The so called experts have tried and failed abysmally, the director of planning was shown to be ill informed and ill prepared. Perhaps at the next meeting he will have done his homework as the rest of the councillors should before they pontificate on what is or is not good for the residents of Poulton who have at least bothered to do theirs.
3

,

20/11/2008 13:11:31
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
4

me2,

Poulton 20/11/2008 13:45:49
I think I've said it before but changing the centre of Poulton is just pushing the problem out slightly! Traffic is bad enough on Station road, vicarage road and Lower green so pedestrianising is really the most ridiculous thing. Reversing a one way system will give relief how - same traffic just going a different way? hmmm! The council really thought this one through!!! Leave poulton alone.. if you want to decrease congestion put in congestion charging at peak hours... more people will walk to do their shopping, not use Poulton as a by pass and the old dears (and others) wont make uneccessary journeys durng peak hours!!!
5

,

20/11/2008 14:19:06
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
6

Lol, North Shore,

Blackpool 20/11/2008 15:09:04
traffic in poulton is a problem, but how can sending traffic the other way really help this problem? will less people travel as they are going the opposite way round?
7

Fred Decoma,

Thornton Cleveleys 20/11/2008 15:35:46
I see the censor police have been at work again deleted my comment number 5. Why was pointing off illegal parking of delivery veichles on Chappel St unsutiable????
8

Silver Fox 1,

Poulton 20/11/2008 16:37:40
Yeah number 7, I got the chop too (number 3). The town needs traffic and bustle not pedestrianisation...that would knock the buzz out of it. Traffic is a problem but this proposed system won't help...it'll make it worse. ALL traffic from Carleton will go along Ball Street, ALL traffic from Blackpool Old Road will be forced to turn left up Queensway and then most of it right, also onto Ball Street. How can this reduce congestion and pollution?
9

Sir Eel Whinger,

Blackpool 20/11/2008 20:18:12
What do readers think about the pedestrianisation of Poulton Town centre?

I'll admit, I'm dead against it.

People still need access to Dixons.
10

Blackpool Rock,

Poulton 20/11/2008 22:11:16
Why don't the authority try it for a day and then see what happens I think one day would be enough to scrap the plan - No need for road marking changes just a few temporary signs would do ?
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.